香港教學語言問題背景 - University of Hong Kong

香港教學語言問題背景 - University of Hong Kong

2001 12 2002 4 The Questions After implementing mother tongue instruction in junior secondary classes for 3 years, what comes out? What modes of medium of instruction are implemented in senior secondary classes, in particular, in Secondary 4 classes? What are the difficulties encountered by schools and teachers, and what are the supports needed? (The data)The data) (The data)The outcome of impleme ntation in junior classes) (The data)An account of MOI arr angement in senior secondary classes) (The data)probl ems and support) 114 Only about 10% have 10/12/2001 had CMI training.

285 (The data) 1+8+8) The majority (60%) of the 174 switched to CMI within teachers 61%4 years, i.e. around 1998. About 80% of the teachers graduated from EMI schools. 138* 877 780 * Teaching and Learning in Mother Tongue

1 2 3 4 5 * * 14.9% 14.7% 10.2% 14.4% 15.7% 29.0% 27.6% 24.0% 38.8% 44.0%

56.0% 57.8% 65.8% 46.9% 40.3% 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.5 * 7.5% 5.8% 8.4% 9.2% 6.7% 25.6% 31.4% 24.4% 37.5% 46.7% 66.9% 62.8% 67.2% 53.3%

46.6% 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.8 Q11 1 2 3 4 5 Q17 * 2 3

4 1 * 13.5% 17.9% 8.5% 11.2% 27.5% 31.6% 24.9% 39.9% 59.0% 50.4% 66.7% 49.0% 3.7 3.6 3.9 3.7 Q10

16.6% 26.3% 57.1% * 3.7 Q12a * * 16.1% 26.8%

57.1% 3.7 Q12b 1. 2. 3. 8.5% 12.3% 79.2% Q9

Q1 0 76.5%(The data)) - 81.0%(The data)) 44.7%(The data)) - 56.4%(The data)) 79.0%(The data)) 46.5%(The data)), 48.0%(The data)), 49.0%(The data)), 51.5%(The data)) 40.0%(The data)) - 51.5%(The data)) 20.6%(The data)) - 37.0%(The data)) 42.6%(The data)) 21.0%(The data)), 21.8%(The data)), 22.8%(The data)), 23.5%(The data)) 9.4%(The data)) - 23.7%(The data)) 1.0%(The data)) - 6.7%(The data)) 11.7%(The data)) 1.0%(The data)), 1.0%(The data)), 1.0%(The data)), 1.1%(The data))

46.5% 48.8% 51.5% 44.7% 49.0% 56.4% 27.7% 20.8% 26.0% 21.0% 24.8% 18.8% 46.6% 3.9% 19.6% 29.4% 35.6% 5.0% Q10

76.5% 7.8% 11.8% 81.0% 0.0% 11.0% 79.0% 2.0% 5.0% Q1 0

46.6% 53.4% Q15 Finding in 1998 Survey: Schools Tentative MOI choice for Senior Secondary Classes in 2001/02 Tentative Choice (The data)No.)Percent Will adopt EMI (The data)22)16.7% Will adopt CMI (The data)37)28.0% Other modes (The data)17)12.9% Not decided (56)42.4% 4.8%

14.2% 27.8% 16.4% 11.2% 48.8% 25.7% 6.3% 24.6% 7.8% 5.9% N.A. 3.4% 3.1%

Q15 Q22 * (The data)) * (The data)) 4.5 4.5 (The data)3.2%, 1.6%, 95.2%) (The data)3.5%, 8.1%, 88.3%) 4.4 4.4 (The data)3.2%, 8.1%, 88.8%)

(The data)5.3%, 9.9%, 84.6%) 4.2 4.1 (The data)4.8%, 12.1%, 83.1%) (The data)7.0%, 20.3%, 72.7%) 4.2 3.9 (The data)4.8%, 21.8%, 73.4%) (The data)9.8%, 31.5%, 58.6%) 4.1 3.8 (The data)3.2%, 25.2%, 71.5%) (The data)11.3%, 34%, 54.7%) 3.8

3.9 (The data)12.3%, 27.0%, 60.7%) (The data)10.3%, 31.3%, 58.3%) 4.1 3.7 (The data)7.4%, 30.3%, 62.3%) (The data)13.1%, 38.4%, 48.5%) 4.1 3.5 (The data)5.7%, 30.9%, 63.4%) (The data)15.9%, 43.9%, 40.3%) 3.6 3.6 (The data)17.3%, 35.5%, 47.1%) (The data)15.6%, 36.1%, 48.4%) *

Q12 Q13 80% 80% (The data) 50 % ) 50% 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1.

63% / / vs / Q11 2. Q.9 a. b. c. d.

1 2 22.9% 4 5 35.3% * 3.1 15.0% 47.4% 3.3 * 12.1% 60.1% 3.5 20.0% 48.5% 3.3 Q9 3. a b c d e f (The data)1,2) (The data)4,5)

* 22.9% 17.3% 31.5% 15.0% 7.9% 10.3% 40.9% 51.9% 31.5% 62.2% 72.5% 78.0% 3.4 3.7 3.0 3.6 3.9

4.0 * f: e: b, d: Q15 3. Q17 a b c d * 26.8% 33.8% 17.6% 32.0% 54.3% 42.6%

66.7% 26.8% 3.5 3.1 3.9 2.9 18/2 *3 Q17, 18 3. Q19 a b d e g i j l m

(The data)1,2) (The data)4,5) * * Q19 20.0% 53.6% 5.1% 7.0% 11.2% 12.1% 13.8% 6.0% 6.1% 53.1% 14.9% 85.4% 68.1% 72.4% 52.6% 53.4% 74.2% 75.0% 3.7 2.5 4.3 4.1 4.1 4.0 Chinese material is much more problematic.

4.0 4.2 4.2 4. (The data)1,2) (The data)4,5) * * a b c

d e f 15.1% 11.8% 4.5% 8.5% 9.4% 10.7% 8.1% 7.4% 10.0%

47.9% 59.5% 84.8% 65.3% 61.7% 57.7% 62.9% 61.3% 49.7% 3.6 3.8 4.3 4.0 4.0 3.8 3.9 4.0 3.8

16.4% 10.2% 4.5% 9.0% 11.2% 11.6% 9.5% 10.3% 13.8% 49.5% 59.5% 83.7% 61.8% 56.7% 55.1% 56.0% 56.0% 44.7%

3.6 3.9 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.6 * 4.0 * g h i 4.0 4.4 4.3 4.0 4.0

4.0 4.2 4.2 4.0 Q16 Q25 Q19 5. 522 236 758 68.9% 31.1% 100.0%

70% Q22 Q31 572 267 839 68.2% 31.8% 100.0% 5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Q23 Q3 2

(The data)69.4% 72.8%) (The data)51.5%) (The data)48.7%) (The data)45.1%) (The data)40.8%) (The data)38.3% 30.8%) (The data)32.6% 30.4%) (The data)23.9% 27.9%) 1. 2. 3. The Post-study Questions The Miracle of Mother Tongue Education Is there a limit to it? Could we, or should we move the Either(CMI) Or (EMI) Position to somewhere else? Such as the Subjectbased Decision? Are there other questions besides the Effective Question, say, the Affective?

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • National Conference - cdn.fs.pathlms.com

    National Conference - cdn.fs.pathlms.com

    Histograms - SHC's, PAH's/APAH's, Biomarkers, Metals. Determination of processes (Petrogenic, Pyrogenic, Biogenic) Scatter Plots, Radar Plots (PIANO Components) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Data Interpretation Reports. Example Data - GC/FID Traces.
  • Security Overview Strategic Technology Office

    Security Overview Strategic Technology Office

    Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) i-Edison. Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited. 4/5/2018. ... Wide range of temporal and geospatial activities - e.g. days to years, neighborhood to state. Generate scenarios and design / execute the evaluations.
  • Say What You Mean, Mean What You Say

    Say What You Mean, Mean What You Say

    Say What You Mean, Mean What You Say Marc Morgan, Household Hazardous Waste Coordinator NH Department of Environmental Services Be Clear Define the Goal What are you trying to accomplish? Refine your message Use understandable language Be specific Think Globally,...
  • CHAP 3 FEA for Nonlinear Elastic Problems Nam-Ho

    CHAP 3 FEA for Nonlinear Elastic Problems Nam-Ho

    This chapter will focus on how to calculate the residual and tangent stiffness for a nonlinear elasticity model. ... Equality and/or inequality constraints in constitutive relations. History-dependent. nonlinear relations between stress and strain.
  • Autotuning Sparse Matrix and Lattice-Boltzmann Kernels

    Autotuning Sparse Matrix and Lattice-Boltzmann Kernels

    Try to maximize TLB page locality Solution: borrow a technique from compilers for vector machines: Fuse spatial loops Strip mine into vectors of size vector length (VL) Interchange spatial and velocity loops Can be generalized by varying: The number of...
  • Title Slide - Portland Cement Association

    Title Slide - Portland Cement Association

    The strength of the cementitious paste binder in concrete depends on the quality and quantity of the reacting paste components and on the degree to which the hydration reaction has progressed. Concrete becomes stronger with time as long as there...
  • Frog oral cavity - Fayetteville State University

    Frog oral cavity - Fayetteville State University

    Frog oral cavity a. Esophagus opening. b. Vomerine teeth. 1. Grove of the maxilla. 2. Maxillary teeth. 3. Internal nare. 4. Eye ball. 5. Eustachian tube opening.
  • データガバナンス

    データガバナンス

    As the data of experiment results, etc. are facts or ideas and not the works, the graph only expressing the data based on a general method does not have the creativity of work, although there are some range of variation...