Theoretical Perspectives: Realism

Theoretical Perspectives: Realism

Theoretical Perspectives: Realism Realism in Global Politics Realism is a theoretical perspective in which power is seen as the currency of global politics States are concerned with how much power they have and how much power they have relative to other states

Global Politics IS Power Politics Structural Realist Theory WHY DO STATES WANT POWER? Classical Realist Classical Realism Human nature to

want power States are led with by individuals with an innate need to dominate their rivals Hans Morgenthau Structural Realism States pursue power

because of the nature of the international system States are trapped in an iron cage where they have little option but to compete with each other for power to ensure their own survival John Mearsheimer

What is the key difference between classical and structural realists? Classical: Power is an end sui generis Structural: Power is a means to an end. The end is the We will focus on structural realism

A states power comes from 2 sources: The material capabilities a state controls: military resources such as armoured divisions and nuclear weapons Latent power: based on a states wealth and size of its overall population 5 Key Assumptions of Structural Realism 1. States operate in an anarchic global

system 2. All states possess some offensive military capability 3. States can never know the intentions of other states 4. The main goal of states is survival 5. States are rational actors 1. States operate in an anarchic system Anarchy is an ordering principle

The is no central authority that stands above states in the system The opposite of anarchy is hierarchy which is the ordering principle of domestic politics 2. All states possess some offensive military capacity Each state has the power to inflict harm upon its neighbors Capacity varies massively between

states 3. States can never know the intentions of other states States ultimately want to know whether other states are determined to use force to alter the balance of power (revisionist states), or whether they are satisfied enough with it that they have no interest in using force to change it (status quo states). It is almost impossible to discern another states intentions with a high degree of certainty.

Unlike military capabilities, intentions cannot be empirically verified. Intentions are in the minds of decision-makers 4. The primary goal of all states is survival States also have other goals - e.g. prosperity, protecting human rights Survival is primary goal if a state does not survive it will not achieve any of its goals

5. States are rational actors States are capable of coming up with sound strategies that maximize their prospects for survival. They may miscalculate from time to time. Because states operate with imperfect information in a complicated world, they sometimes make serious mistakes.

It gets more confusing Offensive Structural Realism Defensive Structural Realism It makes sense for states to pursue as much as power as possible Unwise for states to

maximize their share of power as the global political system will punish them if they attempt to gain too much States should pursue hegemony where possible Key writer: John Mearsheimer

Pursuit of hegemony is foolish Key writer: Kenneth Waltz What is the key difference between offensive and defensive structural realists? HOW MUCH POWER IS ENOUGH?

Hegemony Offensive Realism Offensive realists argue that states should always be looking for opportunities to gain more power and should do so whenever it seems feasible. States should maximize power, and their ultimate goal should be hegemony, because that is the best way to guarantee survival

Hegemony Defensive Realism While defensive realists recognize that the international system creates strong incentives to gain additional increments of power, they maintain that it is strategically foolish to pursue hegemony. States should not maximize power, but should instead strive for what Kenneth Waltz calls an appropriate amount of power

Why show restraint? Reason 1 Defensive realists emphasize that if any state becomes too powerful, balancing will occur. E.g. Napoleonic France (17921815), Imperial Germany (1900 18), and Nazi Germany (193345) Otto von Bismarcks genius, according to the defensive realists, was that he understood that too much power was bad for Germany, because it would cause its neighbors to balance against it. So, he halted German expansion after winning stunning

victories in the Austro-Prussian (1866) and Franco- Prussian (18701) Wars. Why show restraint? Reason 2 There is an offencedefense balance, which indicates how easy or difficult it is to conquer territory or defeat a defender in battle. The the offencedefense balance is usually heavily weighted in the defenders favor. Any state that attempts to gain large amounts of additional power is likely to end up fighting a series of losing wars.

Accordingly, states will recognize the futility of offence and concentrate instead on maintaining their position in the balance of power. If they do go on the offensive, their aims will be limited. Why show restraint? Reason 3 Even when conquest is feasible, it does not pay: the costs outweigh the benefits. Because of nationalism, it is especially difficult, sometimes impossible, for the conqueror to subdue the conquered.

The ideology of nationalism is all about selfdetermination, which virtually guarantees that occupied populations will rise up against the occupier Conquest is not only difficult but, when it is successful, leads to many difficulties and few benefits

How do Offensive Realists respond? Claim balancing is often inefficient, especially when it comes to forming balancing coalitions, and that this inefficiency provides opportunities for a clever aggressor to take advantage of its adversaries. take issue with the claim that the defender has a significant advantage over the attacker, and thus offence hardly ever pays. acknowledge that sometimes conquest does not pay but they also point out that sometimes it does.

Anything in common? Both defensive and offensive realists agree, however, that nuclear weapons have little utility for offensive purposes, except where only one side in a conflict has them. The reason is simple: if both sides have a survivable retaliatory capability, neither gains an advantage from striking first. Moreover, both camps agree that conventional war between nuclear-armed states is possible but not likely,

because of the danger of escalation to the nuclear level. Case Study: Realism and the Rise of China We are going to try and apply what we have learnt by comparing how defensive and offensive realists might view the

recent rise of China as a world power https://www.theguard oct/18/xi-jinping-spee

Recently Viewed Presentations



    Schools should use the Part-Time ADM field in StudentPlus to specify the percent of ADM funding the school should receive. The main reason for having the Home School No ADM option is to have a way to filter-out the students...
  • Unit 8 Marketing Entertainment

    Unit 8 Marketing Entertainment

    Marketing Through Entertainment . Market entertainment and market THROUGH entertainment! Use agencies and promoters! work in entertainment industries, including music and sports, as an individual or organization in the business of marketing and promoting live events, such as concerts/gigs, sports...


    Regular meetings -- monthly conference calls. Ad-hoc meetings -- working group meetings. Award of Excellence ----- Initiated in 2012 in Auckland, 8 outstanding women. Women's Com. function at Grand Final ----- Workshop, Forum, Novice Aquathlon , IF Mixed Relay,IF Mixed...
  • Supporting document for The Potential Source Materials for

    Supporting document for The Potential Source Materials for

    The Potential Source Materials for Recurring Slope Lineae on Mars: Subsurface Hydrous Chlorides and Oxychlorine Salts (HyCOS Authors Alian Wang1, ZongchengLing2, Y. C. Yan1, Alfred S. McEwen3, Michael T. Mellon4, Michael D. Smith5, Bradley L. Jolliff1, James Head6
  • SPIDER FRIENDLY WEB - University of Texas at El Paso

    SPIDER FRIENDLY WEB - University of Texas at El Paso

    Meta Tags Make sure your web includes Meta Name: Title Keywords Description. Use HTML example or Meta Tag Generator. Keywords Choose keywords related to your site. Use keyword phrases to narrow competitive keywords. Use bold font for keywords. Use each...
  • Area 42 Fall Assembly 2017 Delegates Report Presented

    Area 42 Fall Assembly 2017 Delegates Report Presented

    Empowered to Manage & Conduct World Service Affairs. Provides Input & Guidance "Delegates" Decision-making "The strength of our whole AA service structure starts with the group and with the General Service Representatives the group elects. I cannot emphasize too strongly...
  • Economics of Tort Law - University of Dayton

    Economics of Tort Law - University of Dayton

    An efficient system would minimize these elements of cost. Cost of injuries. Cost of precaution. Cost of administration. ... Breach of Duty - The defendant's act or failure to act must constitute the breach of a duty owed to the...
  • Faculty Senate Meeting January 25, 2018 1 Agenda

    Faculty Senate Meeting January 25, 2018 1 Agenda

    Update: Web initiative from President Choi. President Choi asked Gary Allen (UM System IT) to come up with an alternative to terminal four for campus websites. Pantheon was chosen, but the campuses are not required to replace terminal four. Our...