Award Review Process Presenter: Kadija Baffoe-Harding Award Review
Award Review Process Presenter: Kadija Baffoe-Harding Award Review Process Cycle Grants.gov Finance/ CAMS ASAP Grants
Online OLA/OLIA Recipient Org Program Office Grants Office
Financial Assistance Award Documentation Recipient responsibilities: -SF-424, SF-424A or SF-424C, SF-424B or SF-424D, CD511, SF-LLL, and CD-346 (at the request of the Grants Office if necessary) Project description; and Budget narrative
Program Officer responsibilities: the Request for Application (RFA) for the award, documents required for type of award (competitive, non-competitive, institutional, section 404, etc.), completed PO Checklist, Procurement Request, and NEPA documentation. Application Review Grants Management Specialist Responsibilities: Review PO Checklist to determine type of award and the basis of funding
There are two type of financial assistance awards: Grants Cooperative Agreements There are six bases of funding for financial assistance:
Competitive Non-Competitive Congressionally Directed (Soft Earmark) Institutional Formula/Allotment Congressionally Mandated (Hard Earmark) Application Review GMS Responsibilities contd: Review CD-435 Procurement request to ensure correct accounting data and that funds are available for obligation, NEPA to ensure approval by designated NEPA official and any other associated
documentation, Application package submitted by the recipient via Grants.gov to ensure all required documents have been submitted and signed by the recipient authorized representative, also that the Minimum Requirements List has been completed by the Program Office Complete GMD Checklist Cost analysis Special Award Conditions GMD Checklist Application Review Due Diligence It is the responsibility of the Grants Management Specialist and Program Officer to ensure that the recipient requesting funding is properly prepared to receive and manage federal funds.
Therefore, we perform a series of checks to ensure that the all required systems are in place. We call this due diligence. Cost analysis ensures that the recipient is in line with the OMB Circulars (A-21, A-87, A-110 and A-122) and Administrative Requirements (15 CFR 14 and 15 CFR 24) to which they are
governed. System for Award Management (SAM) allows the GMS to ensure that the entity and key personnel have not been excluded from receiving federal funds. Do Not Pay permits the GMS to review payment history or delinquency of applicants in the pre-award and pre-payment process to verify eligibility of Financial Assistance. Single Audit Clearinghouse and Federal Audit Clearinghouse ensures the timely submission of the audits under the A-133 requirement and allows the review of any issues and the corrective action plans in place to address any issues to safeguard federal funds. Dunn and Bradstreet (if applicable) to verify applicant stability and credit rating. Application Review Cost Analysis is the review of the budget narrative and line item
budget in accordance with appropriate OMB cost principals and any governing NOAA/Department of Commerce statute. This ensures the costs associated with the application are reasonable, allowable and allocable. Recipient should also ensure that the costs are treated consistently in accordance with their own policies. A well written budget justification submitted by the recipient that addresses all of the object class categories allows for an easily conducted cost analysis by the GMS Application Review The Cost Analysis is based on the
object class categories outlined on the SF-424A Line Item Budget -Personnel -Fringe Benefits -Travel -Equipment -Supplies -Contractual -Construction -Other -Indirect Charges -Program Income (if applicable)
Application Review Breakdown of information required for each Object Class Category: Personnel name, position, salary and the time commitment of all employees. Fringe Benefits description and breakdown of benefits by personnel when rates are higher than 35%. Travel provide a detailed breakdown of travel costs. Domestic, Foreign and local travel must state the purpose of travel, method of travel, estimate mileage, cost per mile, duration, number of travelers and per diem rate for meals and lodging.
Application Review Breakdown of information required for each Object Class Category: Equipment any item that the unit cost is $5,000 or more and has a useful life of more than one year. A lease vs. purchase should be completed when appropriate. Supplies provide a breakdown of cost for supplies totaling more than $5,000 or 5% of the total project (Federal and Non-Federal funds). Contractual provide a separate budget for each contract or subcontract regardless of the dollar value. Verify subcontractor selection via System for Award Management (SAM) www.sam.gov
Cost Sharing or Matching is the portion of project or program costs not borne by the Federal Government. The recipients portion of costs can be cash or in-kind donation (recipient resources or third party contributions). Once the recipient agrees to a level of cost-share or match in their award agreement, they are required to provide that level of match to complete the award. Cost Sharing or Matching
Cost sharing or Matching can be Voluntary Required by Program Solicitation Required by Regulation or Statutory Authority Cost Sharing or Matching All contributions, including cash and third party in-kind, shall be accepted as part of the recipients cost sharing or matching when such contributions meet all of the following criteria. (1) Are verifiable from the recipients records. (2) Are not included as contributions for any other federallyassisted project or program. (3) Are necessary and reasonable for proper and efficient accomplishment of project or program objectives.
Cost Sharing or Matching (4) Are allowable under the applicable cost principles. (5) Are not paid by the Federal Government under another award, except where authorized by Federal statute to be used for cost sharing or matching. (6) Are provided for in the approved budget when required by the Federal awarding agency (NOAA Requires). Referenced: Title 2 Sec. 215.23 Cost Sharing or Matching DOC Financial Assistance Standard Terms and
Conditions Shared allowable costs Federal and Non-Federal ratio Expended at the same general rate as the federal share Cost Sharing or Matching Cost Sharing or Matching Funds. Cash and in-kind contributions that are included in the budget of the award must be valued in accordance with the applicable administrative requirements and are subject to the appropriate cost principles.
Cost Share and Matching Valuation Indirect costs Recipient contributions Skilled and unskilled volunteer labor
Services offered by a non-recipient employer. The value donated supplies (expendable equipment, office supplies, etc) Donated equipment, buildings or land (where title passes to the recipient)
Cost Sharing or Matching FINALLY A FEW THINGS TO REMEMBER Accurate Records of all costs Documentation for Federal and Non-Federal Share Valuation Audit Finding Award Review The special award conditions are the specific administrative and programmatic guidelines
associated with the individual award. The CD-450 Financial Assistance Award is the official agreement document that is signed by a Grants Officer and countersigned by the recipient and has the award amount, cost principles, OMB Circulars and Code of Federal Regulations that govern the recipient entity. Award Review FALD review(Financial Assistance Law Division) if applicable. Grants Officer review and approval.
Once the award is approved it then goes to Finance for obligation in the Commerce Business System (CBS). Award Review OLIA (Office of Legislative Intergovernmental Affairs) for congressional announcement, if applicable. Finance certifies the funds and the award becomes available to the recipient. Multi-Year Awards It is the recommendation of the Grants Office for those
programs who fund applications for two or more years to convert to multi-year awards. Multi-Year Awards Minimize paperwork Allow for expedient processing for out-year funding Only require FALD review and OLIA clearance (where applicable) at award inception Questions
LINEAR OPTIMIZATION MODEL CLASSIFICATION Linear optimization or linear programming Objective and all constraints are linear functions of the decision variables. Nonlinear optimization or nonlinear programming Either objective or a constraint (or both) are nonlinear functions of the decision variables.
A week later she returns and you note that her blood results show a raised high haemoglobin and a raised pack cell volume and red blood cell count. A 12-year-old girl of Nigerian descent and with a known blood disorder...
Epigenetics research indicates that this trauma can be passed on to future generations through our DNA. Yolanda Flores Niemann; Microaggressions Keynote Slides for University at Buffalo, SUNY. Stereotypes - Activity 3 ... "Jokes" about blond women with message of unintelligence...
UNEP's Perspective on Technology Transfer Technology transfer must be viewed broadly: hardware and software elements are both critical: awareness raising, training and capacity building, sharing of best management practices, information exchange, networking, outreach these 'softer elements ...
Times New Roman Wingdings Verdana Arial Tahoma Nature Proposal for Strategic CENG Initiative on Sustainability Sustainability In 1987, the World Commission on Environment and Development developed a definition of sustainability that was included in its findings, which became known as...
Redesign of slides created by Randal E. Bryant and David R. O'Hallaron. Cache Memories. Today. Cache memory organization and operation. Performance impact of caches. ... Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. 8 April, 2014. Chapter 5 — Large and Fast: Exploiting Memory Hierarchy....
Frozen is one of the only Disney movies to promote the prince as being the villain, and having two sisters save the day. Frozen has many songs of different genres throughout the movie, which are all very catchy and easy...
USCG area exercise schedules will come from CPS. ... Once District is satisfied with ACP, submission to NRP. 4 members of NRP review ACP CONCURRENTLY, and populate comment log; NRP discusses. NRP sends comment log BACK to District.
Ready to download the document? Go ahead and hit continue!