Collaborative Implementation of Shared Decision Making State Legislation
Collaborative Implementation of
Shared Decision Making State Legislation
Megan Morris, MS CCC-SLP ; Leah Hole-Curry, JD ; Douglas Conrad, PhD, MBA, MHA ; Anne Renz, MPH
Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA;
Dept. of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; 3 Washington State Health Care Authority, Olympia, WA
Shared Decision Making (SDM) is a collaborative model of patient-provider
communication in which a health care provider and patient jointly consider treatment
options and the patients values and preferences. SDM involves multiple steps to
ensure that patients understand the risks and benefits of all treatment options.
Decision aids (DAs) are used to inform patients about treatment options. Multiple
benefits of SDM and DAs have been demonstrated, including improved patient
outcomes and increased patient and provider satisfaction.
In 2007, recognizing these benefits, the Washington State Legislature passed a bill
mandating that the Health Care Authority implement an SDM demonstration project
at one or more multi-specialty practice sites. Because the legislation did not include
appropriated funds, the Health Care Authority sought collaborators for the
demonstration. Researchers from the University of Washington obtained funding
from a foundation to facilitate an SDM demonstration. Three practice sites in the
Puget Sound area are currently participating in the project.
What is Shared Decision Making?
Shared decision making (SDM) is a way to make clinical care decisions for specific
medical conditions. There are some conditions for which scientific evidence suggests that
several treatment options provide similar outcomes, but with different side effects, risks,
or courses of disease. The point of SDM is that in these instances, the patients should
play an important role in deciding which treatment to undertake, based on their values and
preferences. Treatment decisions should be shared between patient and provider.
National health care reform bill HR 3590 includes a section on SDM that calls for
creating Shared Decision Making Resource Centers and awarding grant funding to
providers for developing, implementing, and assessing SDM and DAs. As one of the
few states with an active SDM demonstration project, Washington State offers
important lessons in collaboration and implementation.
Summary and Current Status of the Project
Start-up: Early steps in the project included obtaining IRB approval, identifying
executive champions and project managers at each site, choosing conditions of
interest, and creating workflow process maps.
Dissemination: Activities include:
1)Developing a website that features information about SDM, project partners and
sponsors, SDM legislation, related resources, and a toolbox containing templates
for many aspects of SDM implementation,
2)Being interviewed for an article about SDM (Harris Meyer, Power to the
Patient, Hospitals & Health Networks, February 2010),
3)Hosting a conference for site partners, interested parties, and Foundation
representatives in March 2010
4)Presenting posters at the Washington State Public Health Associations Joint
Conference on Health and at the Society for Medical Decision Makings annual
Monthly Meetings: We hold monthly meetings, sometimes featuring expert guest
speakers, to discuss the demonstration project and SDM generally. Attendees include
representatives from the demonstration sites, the Washington State Health Care
Authority, Group Health, and the Puget Sound Health Alliance.
Decision Aid Distribution: The demonstration sites have distributed a total of 48
decision aids (DAs) and received back 19 surveys. The distribution of decision aids is
Background on SDM Demonstration Project
23 preference-sensitive DAs (early breast cancer, DCIS, hip and knee osteoarthritis)
24 chronic condition DAs (chronic low back pain, chronic pain management, depression,
1 screening DA (colon cancer screening)
The WA State legislature passed a bill that mandated, but did not fund, the state
HCA to implement decision aid demonstration projects.
In response, HCA convened a Collaborative Stakeholder Group. The groups
members include representatives from the University of Washington, the Puget
Sound Health Alliance, Group Health Cooperative, and several multispecialty
Lessons Learned: We learned the importance of having both executive champions
and project managers, working through competing priorities, and the value of being
part of a network.
Representatives from UW secured funding to fund the demonstration project
Center for Shared Decision Making (Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center):
Decision aids are a way to provide patients with information about treatment
options, the risks and benefits associated with each one, and the likely outcomes
and side effects in an easy-to-understand fashion.
Ottawa Patient Decision Aids (OHRI): http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/decaids.html
Washington State (2007) E2S S.B. 5930: Blue Ribbon Commission on Health Care
Costs and Access:
Decision aids have been developed for a number of preference-sensitive
conditions, chronic conditions, and screening options.
Preliminary data about decision aids suggest that they can be used successfully to
increase patient-provider communication and promote shared decision making.
Acknowledgements and References
This study is funded in part by the Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making
(Boston, MA). Partial support is also provided by the National Institutes of Health, National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Center for Medical
Rehabilitation Research (T32HD007424).
Demonstration sites and conditions of interest
The Everett Clinic
MultiCare Medical Group
Virginia Mason Medical Center Seattle
Conditions of Interest
- Hip Osteoarthritis
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Low Back Pain
- Chronic Pain
- PSA Testing
- Colon Cancer Screening
- Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
- Early Stage Breast Cancer
Benefits of Shared Decision Making
Patients are more invested in their medical care and understand the treatment better, which
leads to better adherence to a medical treatment
Increased understanding of a treatment leads to better self-management and health outcomes
Increased patient satisfaction
Decreased medical costs
Decreased malpractice claims
1.Edwards, M., Davies, M., & Edwards, A. (2009). What are the external influences on information exchange and shared decisionmaking in healthcare consultations: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Patient Education & Counseling, 75(1), 37-52.
2.Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., Kinnersley, P., & Grol, R. (2000). Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences
of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract, 50(460), 892-899.
3.Gravel, K., Legare, F., & Graham, I. D. (2006). Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical
practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implement Sci, 1, 16.
4.Makoul, G., & Clayman, M. L. (2006). An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns,
5.Mauksch, L. B., Dugdale, D. C., Dodson, S., & Epstein, R. (2008). Relationship, communication, and efficiency in the medical
encounter: creating a clinical model from a literature review. Arch Intern Med, 168(13), 1387-1395.
6.Towle, A., & Godolphin, W. (1999). Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making... including
commentary by Greenhalgh T and Gambrill J. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 319(7212), 766-771.
7.Whitney, S. N., Holmes-Rovner, M., Brody, H., Schneider, C., McCullough, L. B., Volk, R. J., et al. (2008). Beyond shared
decision making: an expanded typology of medical decisions. Med Decis Making, 28(5), 699-705.
The Human Body: Anatomical Regions, Directions, and Body Cavities. Overview of Anatomy. Anatomy ... - study of internal structures as they relate to the overlying skin. Microscopic Anatomy. Cytology - study of the cell. Histology - study of tissues. Developmental...
A position, in any one futures month, comprised of 50 or more futures equivalent paired swaps or swaptions based on same commodity underlying certain physical commodity futures, grouped separately by swaps and swaptions, then grouped by gross long contracts or...
What is Interprofessional Education (IPE)? "Interprofessional education occurs when students from two or more professions learn about, from, and with each other to enable effective collaboration and improve health outcomes.Once students understand how to work interprofessionally, they are ready to...
Bank: The primary function of a bank is to take deposits from savers and use these deposits to make loans to people who want to borrow. ... If consumers save $50 million and spend $150 million, then national saving and...
Verify Request via caller I.D. Determine nearest available and appropriate District Task Force/Strike Team Contact District Mutual Aid System Dispatch Center Relay all Worksheet information Confirm Local Assembly Staging Area Location Statewide Control Center Procedures Confirm Primary and Secondary Task...
Times New Roman Helvetica Symbol Wingdings 3 Default Design MathType 5.0 Equation Bitmap Image ONE-BOX MODEL EXAMPLE: GLOBAL BOX MODEL FOR CO2 (Pg C yr-1) SPECIAL CASE: SPECIES WITH CONSTANT SOURCE, 1st ORDER SINK TWO-BOX MODEL defines spatial gradient between...
Ready to download the document? Go ahead and hit continue!