Enzyme Engineering & Technology - الصفحات الشخصية

Enzyme Engineering & Technology - الصفحات الشخصية

Enzyme Engineering & Technology Lecturer Dr. Kamal E. M. Elkahlout Assistant Prof. of Biotechnology 1 CHAPTER 3 Immobilized enzymes and their uses 2

Enzyme reactors An enzyme reactor consists of a vessel, or series of vessels, used to perform a desired conversion by enzymatic means (Figure 5.1). Factors that affect choice of reactor for a process: 1) Costs associated with substrate(s), downstream processing, labor, depreciation, overheads and process development. 2) Costs concerned with building and running the enzyme reactor. 3) Form of the enzyme of choice (i.e. free or immobilized). 4) Kinetics of the reaction.

5) Chemical and physical properties of an immobilization support (particulate, membranous or fibrous, density, compressibility, robustness, particle size and regenerability). 6) Scale of operation. 7) Possible need for pH and temperature control. 8) Supply and removal of gases . 9) Stability of the enzyme, substrate and product.

(a) Stirred Tank Reactors Batch reactors generally consist of a tank containing a stirrer (stirred tank reactor, STR). The tank is normally fitted with fixed baffles that improve the stirring efficiency. In batch reactor all of the product is removed, as rapidly as is practically possible, after a fixed time. The enzyme and substrate molecules have identical residence times within the reactor.

a) Stirred tank batch reactor (STR), which contains all of the enzyme and substrates) until the conversion is complete; b) batch membrane reactor (MR), where the enzyme is held within membrane tubes which allow the substrate to diffuse in and the product to diffuse out. This reactor may often be used in a semicontinuous manner, using the same enzyme solution for several batches; c) packed bed reactor (PBR), also called plug -flow reactor (PFR), containing a settled bed of immobilised enzyme particles; d)continuous flow stirred tank reactor (CSTR) which is a continuously operated version of (a); e) continuous flow membrane reactor (CMR) which is a continuously operated version of (b);

f) fluidized bed reactor (FBR), where the flow of gas and/or substrate keeps the immobilised enzyme particles in a fluidized state. In some circumstances there may be a need for further additions of enzyme and/or substrate (i.e. fed -batch operation). Disadvantages: The operating costs are higher than for continuous processes due to the necessity for the reactors to be emptied and refilled both regularly and often. There are considerable periods when such reactors are not productive.

It also makes uneven demands on both labor and services. STRs can be used for processes involving non-immobilized enzymes. Batch reactors also suffer from pronounced batch-to-batch variations. Reaction conditions change with time. May be difficult to scale-up due to the changing power requirements for efficient fixing. Advantageous features: Simplicity both in use and in process development. For this reason they are preferred for small-scale production of highly priced products, especially where the same

equipment is to be used for a number of different conversions. They offer a closely controllable environment that is useful for slow reactions, where the composition may be accurately monitored, and conditions (e.g. temperature, pH, coenzyme concentrations) varied throughout the reaction. They are also of use when continuous operation of a process proves to be difficult due to the viscous or intractable nature of the reaction mix. All reactors would additionally have heating/cooling coils. (interior in reactors (a), and (d), and exterior, generally, in reactors (b), (c), (e) and (f)).

Stirred reactors may contain baffles in order to increase (reactors (a), (b), (d) and (e) or decrease (reactor (f)) the stirring efficiency. The continuous reactors ((c) -(f)) may all be used in a recycle mode where some, or most, of the product stream is mixed with the incoming substrate stream. All reactors may use immobilized enzymes. In addition, reactors (a), (b) and (e) (plus reactors (d) and (f), if semipermeable membranes are used on their outlets) may be used with the soluble enzyme. (b) Membrane reactors

The main requirement for a membrane reactor (MR) is a semipermeable membrane which allows the free passage of the product molecules but contains the enzyme molecules. A cheap example of such a membrane is the dialysis membrane used for removing low molecular weight species from protein preparations. The usual choice for a membrane reactor is a hollow-fiber reactor consisting of a preformed module containing hundreds of thin tubular fibers each having a diameter of about 200 m and a membrane thickness of about 50m. m and a membrane thickness of about 50 m and a membrane thickness of about 50m. m. Membrane reactors may be used in either batch or continuous mode and allow the easy separation of the

enzyme from the product. They are normally used with soluble enzymes, avoiding the costs and problems associated with other methods of immobilization and some of the diffusion limitations of immobilized enzymes. If the substrate is able to diffuse through the membrane, it may be introduced to either side of the membrane with respect to the enzyme. Otherwise it must be within the same compartment as the enzyme, a configuration that imposes a severe restriction on the flow rate through the reactor, if used in continuous mode.

Due to the ease with which membrane reactor systems may be established, they are often used for production on a small scale (g to kg), especially where a multi-enzyme pathway or coenzyme regeneration is needed. They allow the easy replacement of the enzyme in processes involving particularly labile enzymes and can also be used for biphasic reactions. The major disadvantage of these reactors concerns the cost of the membranes and their need to be replaced at regular intervals. The kinetics of membrane reactors are similar to those of the batch STR, in batch mode, or the CSTR, in continuous

mode. Deviations from these models occur primarily in configurations where the substrate stream is on the side of the membrane opposite to the enzyme and the reaction is severely limited by its diffusion through the membrane and the products' diffusion in the reverse direction. Under these circumstances the reaction may be even more severely affected by product inhibition or the limitations of reversibility than is indicated by these models. Continuous flow reactors

The advantages of immobilized enzymes as processing catalysts are most markedly appreciated in continuous flow reactors. In these, the average residence time of the substrate molecules within the reactor is far shorter than that of the immobilized-enzyme catalyst. This results in a far greater productivity from a fixed amount of enzyme than is achieved in batch processes. It also allows the reactor to handle substrates of low solubility by permitting the use of large volumes containing low concentrations of substrate. The constant reaction conditions may be expected to result

in a purer and more reproducible product. There are two extremes of process kinetics in relation to continuous flow reactors; A) The ideal continuous flow stirred tank reactor (CSTR), in which the reacting stream is completely and rapidly mixed with the whole of the reactor contents and the enzyme contacts low substrate and high product concentrations;. B) The ideal continuously operated packed bed reactor ( PBR), where no mixing takes place and the enzyme contacts high substrate and low product concentrations. The properties of the continuously operated fluidized

bed reactor (FBR) lie, generally, somewhere between these extremes. An ordered series of CSTRs or FBRs may approximate, in use where the outlet of one reactor forms the inlet to the next reactor, to an equivalent PBR. (c) Packed bed reactors The most important characteristic of a PBR is that material flows through the reactor as a plug; they are also called plug flow reactors (PFR). Ideally, all of the substrate stream flows at the same velocity, parallel to the reactor axis with no back -mixing.

All material present at any given reactor cross -section has had an identical residence time. The longitudinal position within the PBR is, therefore, proportional to the time spent within the reactor. All product emerging with the same residence time and all substrate molecule having an equal opportunity for reaction. The conversion efficiency of a PBR, with respect to its length, behaves in a manner similar to that of a well -stirred batch reactor with respect to its reaction time. Each volume element behaves as a batch reactor as it passes through the PBR.

Any required degree of reaction may be achieved by use of an idea PBR of suitable length. In order to produce ideal plug -flow within PBRs, a turbulent flow regime is preferred to laminar flow, as this causes improved mixing and heat transfer normal to the flow and reduced axial back-mixing. Consequent upon the plug -flow characteristic of the PBR is that the substrate concentration is maximized, and the product concentration minimized, relative to the final conversion at every point within the reactor; the effectiveness factor being high on entry to the reactor and low close to the exit.

This means that PBRs are the preferred reactors, all other factors being equal, for processes involving product inhibition, substrate activation and reaction reversibility. They are easily fouled by colloidal or precipitating material. The design of PBRs does not allow for control of pH, by addition of acids or bases, or for easy temperature control where there is excessive heat output, a problem that may be particularly noticeable in wide reactors (> 15 cm diameter). Deviations from ideal plug-flow are due to back-mixing within the reactors, the resulting product streams

having a distribution of residence times. In an extreme case, back-mixing may result in the kinetic behavior of the reactor approximating to that of the CSTR (see below), and the consequent difficulty in achieving a high degree of conversion. These deviations are caused by channeling, where some substrate passes through the reactor more rapidly, and hold-up, which involves stagnant areas with negligible flow rate. Channels may form in the reactor bed due to excessive pressure drop, irregular packing or uneven application of the substrate stream, causing flow rate differences across

the bed. The use of a uniformly sized catalyst in a reactor with an upwardly flowing substrate stream reduces the chance and severity of non-ideal behaviour. (d) & (e) Continuous flow stirred tank reactors This reactor consists of a well -stirred tank containing the enzyme, which is normally immobilized. The substrate stream is continuously pumped into the reactor at the same time as the product stream

is removed. If the reactor is behaving in an ideal manner, there is total back-mixing and the product stream is identical with the liquid phase within the reactor and invariant with respect to time. Some molecules of substrate may be removed rapidly from the reactor, whereas others may remain for substantial periods. The reaction S>>>>>>>>>P is assumed, and substrate molecules that have long residence times are converted into product. The average residence time of the product being greater

than that for the substrate. The composition of the product stream is identical with that of the liquid phase within the reactor. These reactors may be operated for considerably longer periods than that determined by the inactivation of their contained immobilized enzyme, particularly if they are capable of high conversion at low substrate concentrations. This is independent of any enzyme stabilization and is simply due to such reactors initially containing large amounts of redundant enzyme. In general, there is little or no back -pressure to increased flow rate through the CSTR.

Such reactors may be started up as batch reactors until the required degree of conversion is reached, when the process may be made continuous. CSTRs are not generally used in processes involving high conversions but a train of CSTRs may approach the PBR performance. This train may be a number (greater than three) of reactors connected in series or a single vessel divided into compartments. In order to minimize back-mixing CSTRs may be used with soluble rather than immobilized enzyme if an ultrafiltration membrane is used to separate the reactor output stream from the reactor contents.

This causes a number of process difficulties, including concentration polarization or inactivation of the enzyme on the membrane but may be preferable in order to achieve a combined reaction and separation process or where a suitable immobilized enzyme is not readily available. (f) Fluidized bed reactors These reactors generally behave in a manner intermediate between CSTRs and PBRs. They consist of a bed of immobilized enzyme which is fluidized

by the rapid upwards flow of the substrate stream alone or in combination with a gas or secondary liquid stream, either of which may be inert or contain material relevant to the reaction. A gas stream is usually preferred as it does not dilute the product stream. There is a minimum fluidization velocity needed to achieve bed expansion, which depends upon the size, shape, porosity and density of the particles and the density and viscosity of the liquid. This minimum fluidization velocity is generally fairly low (about 0.2 -I.0 cm s-1) as most immobilized-enzyme particles have densities close to that of the bulk liquid.

In this case the relative bed expansion is proportional to the superficial gas velocity and inversely proportional to the square root of the reactor diameter. Fluidising the bed requires a large power input but, once fluidized, there is little further energetic input needed to increase the flow rate of the substrate stream through the reactor. At high flow rates and low reactor diameters almost ideal plug -flow characteristics may be achieved. However, the kinetic performance of the FBR normally lies between that of the PBR and the CSTR, as the small fluid linear velocities allowed by most

biocatalytic particles causes a degree of back-mixing that is often substantial, although never total. The actual design of the FBR will determine whether it behaves in a manner that is closer to that of a PBR or CSTR. It can, for example, be made to behave in a manner very similar to that of a PBR, if it is baffled in such a way that substantial backmixing is avoided. FBRs are chosen when these intermediate characteristics are required, e.g. where a high conversion is needed but the substrate stream is colloidal or the reaction produces a substantial pH

change or heat output. They are particularly useful if the reaction involves the utilization or release of gaseous material. The FBR is normally used with fairly small immobilized enzyme particles (20-40 mm diameter) in order to achieve a high catalytic surface area. These particles must be sufficiently dense, relative to the substrate stream, that they are not swept out of the reactor. Less-dense particles must be somewhat larger. For efficient operation the particles should be of nearly uniform size otherwise a non-uniform biocatalytic

concentration gradient will be formed up the reactor. FBRs are usually tapered outwards at the exit to allow for a wide range of flow rates. Very high flow rates are avoided as they cause channeling and catalyst loss. The major disadvantage of development of FBR process is the difficulty in scaling-up these reactors. PBRs allow scale-up factors of greater than 50000 but, because of the markedly different fluidization characteristics of different sized reactors, FBRs can only be scaled-up by a factor of 10 -100 each time. In addition, changes in the flow rate of the substrate

stream causes complex changes in the flow pattern within these reactors that may have consequent unexpected effects upon the conversion rate. Immobilized Enzymes Immobilized enzymes are enzymes which are attached in or onto the surface of an insoluble support Immobilized enzymes have several advantages over the soluble enzyme: Convenience: Miniscule amounts of protein dissolve in the reaction, so workup can be much easier. Upon completion, reaction

mixtures typically contain only solvent and reaction products. Economical: easily removed from the reaction reusage Stability: Immobilized enzymes typically have greater thermal and operational stability than the soluble form of the enzyme Immobilization criteria There are a number of requirements to achieve a successful immobilization: The biological component must retain substantial biological activity after attachment It must have a long-term stability The sensitivity of the enzyme must be preserved after attachment

Overloading can block or inactivate the active site of the immobilized biomaterial, therefore, must be avoided Immobilization methods a) b) c) d) adsorption covalent binding

entrapment encapsulation Adsorption and Ionic binding Simplest immobilization method Mix the enzyme and support in suitable conditions First immobilized enzyme model: invertase on the activated charcoal (Nelson and Griffin, 1916) Forces are weak so leakage is generally a problem Supports such as alluminium hydroxide are often utilized With a suitable charged matrix, ionic interactions may also be promoted

This technique is technically undemanding and economically attractive Regeneration is easy Best known industrial example: amino acylase immobilized on DEAESephadex in the production of amino acids Gel-fibre entrapment and encapsulation Entrapment Enzymes may be entrapped within the matrix of a polymeric gel

Incubate the enzyme together with the gel monomers Promote gel polymerization Polyacrylamide and polymethacrylamide gels are examples Gel pore size is a crucial factor Encapsulation Encapsulation involves entrapping the enzymes within a semipermeable membrane such as cellulose nitrate and nylon-based membranes Covalent immobilization The most widely used method for enzyme immobilization

It is technically more complex It requires a variety of often expensive chemicals It is time-consuming But immobilized enzyme preparations are stable and leaching is minimal Enzymes are immobilized by a suitable group in the surface: Hydroxyl groups in supports (e.g cellulose, dextran, agarose)

Amino, carboxyl and sulfhydryl groups in amino acids Covalent immobilization The conditions for immobilization by covalent binding are much more complicated and less mild than in the cases of physical adsorption and ionic binding. Therefore, covalent binding may alter the conformational structure and active center of the enzyme, resulting in major loss of activity and/or changes of the substrate

Covalent attachment to a support matrix must involve only functional groups of the enzyme that are not essential for catalytic action Higher activities result from prevention of inactivation reactions with amino acid residues of the active sites. A number of protective methods have been devised: Covalent attachment of the enzyme in the presence of a competitive inhibitor or substrate A chemically modified soluble enzyme whose covalent linkage to the matrix is achieved by newly incorporated residues Site-specific immobilization Three different approaches: (a) Gene fusion to incorporate a

peptidic affinity tag at the N- or C-terminus of the enzyme. The enzymes are then attached from this affinity tag to anti-tag antibodies on membranes (b) Modification to incorporate a single biotin moiety on enzymes (see figure) (c) Site-directed mutagenesis to introduce unique cysteines to enzymes. The enzymes are attached on thiol-reactive surfaces through the sulfhydryl

group Properties of support material The form, shape, density, porosity, pore size distribution, operational stability and particle size distribution of the supporting matrix will influence the result The ideal support is cheap, inert, physically strong and stable Ideally, it should:

increase the enzyme specificity (kcat/Km) shift the pH optimum to the desired value for the process discourage microbial growth and non-specific adsorption Some matrices may possess other properties which are useful for particular purposes such as ferromagnetism (e.g. magnetic iron oxide, enabling transfer of the biocatalyst by means of magnetic fields) a catalytic surface (e.g. manganese dioxide, which catalytically removes the inactivating hydrogen peroxide produced by most oxidases)

Kinetic Properties There is usually a decrease in specific activity of an enzyme upon insolubilization: denaturation caused by the coupling process Microenvironment after immobilization may be drastically different from that existing in free solution: the physical and chemical character of the support matrix, or interactions of the matrix with substrates or products involved in the enzymatic reaction The Michaelis constant may decrease by more than one order of magnitude when substrate of opposite charge to the carrier matrix

The diffusion of substrate can limit the rate of the enzyme reaction: the thickness of the diffusion film determines the concentration of substrate in the vicinity of the enzyme and hence the rate of reaction The effect of the molecular weight of the substrate can also be large. This may be an advantage in some cases, since the immobilized enzymes may be protected from attack by large inhibitor molecules Effects of solute diffusion on the kinetics of immobilized enzymes

external diffusion the transport of substrates towards the surface, and products away internal diffusion the transport of the substrates and products, within the pores of immobilised enzyme particles Kinetics of immobilized enzymes

Partitioning effect The solution lying within a few molecular diameters (10 nm) from the surface of an immobilized enzyme will be influenced by both the charge and hydrophobicity of the surface The Km of an enzyme for a substrate is apparently reduced if [S] in the vicinity of the enzyme's active site is higher than that measured in the bulk of the solution Kinetics of immobilized enzymes

A high concentration of ionising groups may cause a partitioning of gases away from the microenvironment with consequent effects on their apparent kinetic parameters It is also a useful method for protecting oxygen-labile enzymes by 'salting out' the oxygen from the vicinity of the enzyme Partition of hydrogen ions The pH of the microenvironment may differ considerably from the pH of the bulk solution Enzyme immobilised on charged supports: free enzyme enzyme bound to a (+)ly charged support; a bulk pH of 5 is needed to produce a pH of 7 within the

microenvironment enzyme bound to a (-)ly charged support; a pH of 7 within the microenvironment is produced by a bulk pH of 9 Kinetics of immobilized enzymes If the surface is predominantly hydrophobic Hydrophobic molecules will partition into the microenvironment of the enzyme and hydrophilic molecules will be partitioned out into the bathing solution Partition will affect the apparent kinetic constants of the enzyme

E.g. the reduction in the Km of immobilised alcohol dehydrogenase for butanol If the support is polyacrylamide, the Km is 0.1 mM but if a more hydrophobic copolymer is used as the support, the K m is reduced to 0.025 mM Kinetics of immobilized enzymes A similar effect may be seen in the case of competitive inhibitors Invertase Ki, mM

free Aniline (hydrophobic) 0.94 Bound to PS (hydrophobic) 0.39 Tris-(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (hydrophilic)

0.45 1.20 Kinetics of immobilized enzymes Enzymatic depolymerisation (including hydrolysis) of macromolecules may be affected by diffusional control Large molecules diffuse fairly slowly. After reaction, the cleaved fragments normally retain their ability to act as substrates for the enzyme They are likely to be cleaved several times while they are in the vicinity of the immobilised enzyme

This causes a significant difference in the molecular weight profiles of the fragments produced by the use of free and immobilised enzymes Kinetics of immobilized enzymes Co-immobilization of the necessary enzymes for the pathway results in a rapid conversion through the pathway due to the localized high concentrations of the intermediates The reduction in the apparent lag phase is most noticeable when there are more enzymes in the pathway It is least pronounced where the flux through the pathway is controlled by the first step

Mixture of free enzymes Co-immobilized enzymes Application of immobilized enzymes Bioreactors Large scale production or conversion of various compounds Application of immobilized enzymes Biosensors An analytical device which can detect and quantify specific analytes in complex samples Biological Sample

Detection Transducer Solution Element Signal Processor Readout Signal Enzyme biosensors Electrodes detecting gases such as O2, CO2, NH3 and various ionic species are

commercially available Application of immobilized enzymes Bioremediation For the removal/detoxification of contaminants E.g. Polyphenol oxidase immobilized on chitosan coated membranes Biosensors a compact analytical device

incorporating a biological sensing element with a transducer Biosensors Enzyme Cell Electroactive substance electrode

pH change pH electrode Micro organism Heat thermistor Antibody

Light counter photon Nucleic acids Mass change piezoelectrical

device READ-OUT TRANSDUCER BIOELEMENT PERFORMANCE FACTORS Selectivity Linear working range Reproducibility Response time

Lifetime The biosensor should be cheap, small, portable and capable of being used by semi-skilled operators Applications of Biosensors Health care and life sciences research applications

Process industries Monitoring of active component or pollutants Food and drink

Glucose and urea sensors Proteomics Genomics Toxicology Oncology Drug discovery Measuring Ripeness

Contaminant/Pathogen Detection Process/Quality Control Detection of Genetically Modified Organisms in Food Environmental monitoring BOD, Pesticide Defence and security Military; Nerve gases and explosives Forensics; DNA identification Beetle/Chip Sensor

Schroth P. et al., Sensors and Actuators B, 78: 1-5, 2001 Whole-beetle Antenna Receptor Molecules Detection of a single, damaged potato plant within a field of a

thousand undamaged plant Bioelectronic sniffer for nicotine Mitsubayashi K. et al, Analytica Chimica Acta A bioelectronic sniffer for nicotine in the gas phase was developed with enzyme inhibition principle to butyrylcholinesterase activity Micromachined sensor for lactate monitoring C.G.J. Schabmueller et al, Biosensors & Bioelectronics 21:1770-1776, 2006 Sport Medicine

location independent, permanent realtime measurement of the lactate concentration during exercise The size of the chip is 5.5 6.4 0.7 mm What else? Engineers for the Japanese company Toto have designed a toilet that analyses urine for glucose concentrations, registers weight and other basic readings, and automatically sends a daily report by modem to the user's doctor... One glucose sensor that looks like a watch sits on the skin and produces small electric shocks, which open up pores so that

fluid can be extracted to monitor tissue glucose concentrations Cyclodextrin as a dehydrogenase mimic R. Kataky and E. Morgan, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 18:1407-1417, 2003 Cyclodextrins are very attractive as biomimetic materials; a suitably modified cyclodextrin may bind the substrate and then catalyse a reaction, mimicking an enzyme-catalysed reaction The model compound: a simple -cyclodextrin derivative with a nicotinamide group attached to the secondary face of a -CD The nicotinamide group would act as the electron transfer agent and

the cyclodextrin would provide a suitable cavity for the reaction to take place in Only small, unbranched alcohols such as ethanol are small enough to fit into the -CD cavity along with the reacting groups... Dendrimers as synthetic enzyme mimics C. Liang and J.M.J. Frchet, Progress in Polymer Science, 30: 385-402, 2005 Substrate migration into the dendrimer interior: The nanoenvironment is greatly influenced by the branching units. These favorable conditions encourage

transition state stabilization. The resulting product is released from the nanoreactor into the solvent (a) Substrate drawn from water into the hydrophobic region in close proximity to amines (b) Charged tetrahedral transition state (TS) intermediate is stabilized by the amide group (c) TS intermediate collapses and pnitrophenolate is released into water Membrane Proteins Membrane proteins account for 2025 % of all open reading

frames Wide range of central functions At least 50 % of all drug targets are membrane proteins PROBLEMS Insoluble in aqueous solution so hard to work with Model Membrane Systems to offer a native environment for the membrane proteins Tethered Bilayer Membranes (tBLM) Artificial lipid bilayers attached

to solid surfaces allow the opportunity to use several surface sensitive techniques Atomic force microscopy Surface plasmon spectroscopy Impedance spectroscopy

Quartz crystal microbalance etc

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Soil Mechanics - I Lecture # 3,4 Chapter

    Soil Mechanics - I Lecture # 3,4 Chapter

    A uniformly graded soil is defined as a soil containing particles having a limited range of sizes (Almost the same sizes) Poorly-Graded Soil: A poorly graded soil is defined as a soil containing particles of varying sizes with intermediate particle...
  • CAP reform seen by the environmental NGOs

    CAP reform seen by the environmental NGOs

    Delegated acts = further watering down of greening (0,3 weighting factor for nitrogen: 0,7 in 2015) BUT Flexibility left to Member states as regards implementation Implementation of the new CAP Timing End of June publication of implementing acts and delegated...
  • A Case for Library Engagement - prism.ucalgary.ca

    A Case for Library Engagement - prism.ucalgary.ca

    These are Cornell-specific examples, but —whether or not they are associated with a specific center of activity—I believe there are faculty in every discipline on every campus who are actively working to advance one or more of the U.N.'s goals.
  • Aflatoxin: A One Health Issue - University of Pittsburgh

    Aflatoxin: A One Health Issue - University of Pittsburgh

    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2008 Jul;25(7):872-84. Marroquín-Cardona A, Deng Y, Garcia-Mazcorro J, Johnson NM, Mitchell N, Tang L, Robinson A 2nd, Taylor J, Wang JS, Phillips TD. Characterization and Safety of Uniform Particle...
  • Absolute Value Inequalities

    Absolute Value Inequalities

    Absolute Value Inequalities Algebra Farmer Bob has four sheep. One day, he notices that they are standing in such a way that they are all the same distance away from each other.
  • General Chemistry 101 CHEM

    General Chemistry 101 CHEM

    Molar Mass. By definition, a molar mass is the mass of 1 mol of a substance (i.e., g/mol). The molar mass of an element is the mass number for the element that we find on the periodic table. The formula...
  • Bomb Calorimetry (Constant Volume Calorimetry)  Reaction carried out

    Bomb Calorimetry (Constant Volume Calorimetry) Reaction carried out

    -202.6 kJ If 1 mol of compound is formed from its constituent elements, then the enthalpy change for the reaction is called the enthalpy of formation, Hof . Standard conditions (standard state): 1 atm and 25 oC (298 K). Standard...
  • ILP-based co-optimization of cut-mask layout, dummy fill and ...

    ILP-based co-optimization of cut-mask layout, dummy fill and ...

    ILP-based co-optimization of cut mask layout, dummy fill and timing for sub-14nm BEOL technology. Kwangsoo Han, Andrew B. Kahng, Hyein Lee and LutongWang