The authors chronicle a renewed sectional struggle in the U.S. Was it territorial expansion, the institution of slavery, or both that provided the historical context for the reemergence of sectionalism? After you read Contending Voices: The Compromise of 1850 analyze the point of view, purpose, and limitations of both excerpts. Argumentation The authors characterize the Kansas-Nebraska Act as one of the most momentous measures ever to pass Congress and a curtain raiser to a terrible drama. Furthermore, they assert that it greased the slippery slope to the Civil War. Form an argument that supports, modifies, or refutes these conclusions
The Popular Sovereignty Panacea The Mexican Cession lands opened a "can of worms" with the question, "What should be done about slavery in these lands?" Further, with this question, the political parties (Whig and Democrat) were put into a tricky position. No matter which way they answered, half of the nation would be offended. Largely, the parties simply chose to sidestep the slavery-expansion question (give no clear answer) so as to offend no one, hopefully. Election of 1848
In the election of 1848, Polk was ailing and would not run again. The Democrats nominated Gen. Lewis Cass who'd spoken previously for popular sovereignty (the people of a territory should decide and issue for themselves). The popular sovereignty position was wellliked by politicians since it enabled them to take a neutral stance and rather say, "Let the people decide." During the campaign, however, he kept rather silent on slavery. General Taylor The Whigs nominated Gen. Zachary Taylor in 1848. He had no political experience but was the "hero of Buena Vista" which went a long
wayhe won the election. Taylor put the question of slavery expansion on the back burner and essentially had no official position on it. Free Soil Party Emerges Notable in 1848 was the Free Soil Party that emerged when many Northerners were upset that neither party took a position on the expansion of slavery. They nominated Martin Van Buren and their position was clearly against the expansion of slavery. The Free Soilers also favored federal money for internal improvements and free land for settlers out west.
The party attracted a wide mix of people: (a) folks upset over getting only 1/2 of Oregon, (b) people who didn't want blacks in the new lands, and (c) northern abolitionists who didn't like slavery. Californy Gold At Sutter's Mill in 1848, gold was discovered. The secret was quickly out and California gold rush was on. The next year, 1849, "Forty-Niners" flooded to California. Dreams of getting rich quick nearly always turned into either going bust or the constant hard work
of moving dirt involved in mining. Perhaps more people made their fortunes out of the myriad of things needed to accompany the miners: general stores, lumberyards, bars, barbershops, bakeries, opera-houses for entertainment, etc. The overall result of the gold rush was that California had enough people to become a state, almost overnight. It applied to be a free state and thus threatened the 15-to-15 slave-to-free balance. Sectional Balance By 1850, the South and slavery was on solid ground because (a) the president (Zachary Taylor) was a Virginia slave owner born/raised in Louisiana, (b) though outnumbered in the
House, the South had equality in the Senate and could therefore block any unwanted laws, and (c) the Constitution favored the South (this would later be upheld in the Dred Scott case). Attack on South? Even though on solid ground, the South felt they were under attack or upset over the following issues The proposition of California as a free state threatened the free/slave state balance. Texas had a disputed region, again, this time into the New Mexico/Colorado/Wyoming area.
Northerners were pushing hard to abolish slavery in Washington D.C. Underground Railroad And most bothersome to the South was the issue of runaway slaves. The Fugitive Slave Law was supposed to "round up" runaways up North and ship them back South. This was largely not being done and the South took it as a personal offense. The Underground Railroad was a secret route from "station to station" that led many slaves to the North and eventually to Canada. Harriet Tubman was the most well-known "conductor" of the "railroad." She snuck back into the South 19 times and led some 300+ slaves to freedom.
With these hot issues heating up, political compromise was needed to avoid violent conflict. Twilight of Senatorial Leaders The 3 leading senators of the past decades had one more round of greatness in them Henry Clay was known as the "Great Compromiser" and offered a compromise here. He was notably seconded by a young Senator Stephen Douglas who will take a larger role in events later. Clay urged both sides to make concessions and to compromise. For the South, John C. Calhoun argued for states'
rights (the same argument as in the tariff crisis of the 1830's). He wanted slavery to be left alone, the runaway slaves to be returned to the South, and state balance kept intact. For the North, Daniel Webster had been opposed to slavery's expansion. But, in his famous "Seventh of March" speech he urged the North to compromise on the issue. He felt that the lands of the Mexican Cession were too dry to grow cotton and therefore wouldn't need slavery anyway. Deadlock and Danger on Capitol Hill
A "Young Guard" of politicians were emerging in Congress. They were more interested in purifying the nation than in preserving it. Chief among the Young Guard was William H. Seward of NY. He was staunchly against slavery and argued that, when it came to slavery, Americans must follow a "higher law" (God's law), above the Constitution. This moral high road may have cost Seward the presidency in 1860. Pres. Zachary Taylor came under Seward influence. He appeared ready to veto any concessions on the matter. The chance for compromise seemed bleak. Balancing the Compromise Scales
What the North got California admitted as a free state. This tipped the balance to the free side, permanently. Texas gave up its claims to lands disputed with New Mexico. The slave trade in District of Columbia was banned, but slavery was still legal. This was symbolic only. It was symbolic in that the nations capital took a stance against the trade. However, it was impractical because the trade only was illegal, not slavery, and since a person could easily buy a slave in next-door Virginia. Balancing the Compromise
Scales What the South got Popular sovereignty in the Mexican Cession lands. This was good for the South because prior to this, there was to be no new slave lands (the 3630 Missouri Compromise line had drawn that). On paper, this opened a lot of land to slavery, possibly. This was bad for the South because those lands were too dry to raise cotton anyway and therefore would never see slaves. Texas was paid $10 million for the land lost to New Mexico. A new, tougher Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 had read teeth in it. Details held that (a) runaway slaves weren't given "due process" rights if caught, (b) the official that handled the case received $5 for a slave's freedom but $10 for a slave's return, and (c) officials were demanded to catch runaway slaves despite their personal convictions on the matter. This Fugitive Slave Law proved to the be most controversial of the measures.
Northerners hated being forced to catch slaves. In places, they passed "Personal Liberty Laws" which stated local officials didn't have to chase and return fugitive slaves. Southerners were outraged that the law was not enforced or was ignored. It was supposed to be one of their major concessions in the Compromise, and it appeared to have been thrown out the window. Anthony Burns personified the law. He was a runaway slave, captured and tried. But, violent protests eventually saw him bought out of slavery. He then went on to college and became a preacher. Who Won? All told, the North got the better of the Compromise of 1850. This is true because (a) the balance tipped their way, (b) the Fugitive Slave Law was largely not enforced, and (c) it bought time before war while the North could
build up their resources. Defeat of the Whigs In the election of 1852, the Democrats nominated unknown Franklin Pierce. Pierce was not a great leader, but had no enemies. The Whigs put Gen. Winfield Scott ("Old Fuss and Feathers"), the hero of the Mexican War, on the ballot. The largest issue of the day, slavery, was soft-pedaled so as to not offend anyone. As a result, the campaign was full of silliness and personal attacks. Slavery did split the Whigs, however. Northern and Southern Whigs disagreed on the party platform and the party candidate. Additionally, the new Free Soil Party garnered 5% of the Northern vote (hurting Scott). As a result, Pierce won in a landslide, 254 to 42 in the
electoral vote. Expansionist Stirrings South of the Border The California Gold Rush had instilled interest in Central America (since many 49'ers had crossed there). And, the British influence in Central America was strong, and perhaps growing, despite the Monroe Doctrine. There were some U.S.-British tensions, but the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty eased them. It said neither the U.S. or Britain would take over the area without the other's agreement. This would later prove to be a roadblock to
Teddy Roosevelt's construction of the Panama Canal. Throwing Fuel on Slavocracy Activities in Latin America succeeded in throwing fuel on the slavocracy theory (a conspiracy theory where the South was supposedly always seeking to add new slave lands). In the summer of 1856, Southerner William Walker tried to take over Nicaragua. He did so, sort of, named himself president, legalized slavery, and wished for Pres. Pierce to annexed the region. Meanwhile,
Nicaraguans reclaimed their land and executed him. South Looks to Cuba Southerners also looked to Cuba. Americans offered to buy Cuba from Spain but were turned down. So, in 1850-51, two groups of filibusteros("freebooters" or pirates including some leading Southerners) invaded Cuba. Their half-baked plan was to somehow take over and claim Cuba for the U.S. They failed miserably. In 1854, Cubans seized the American ship Black Warrior on a technical issue. Pierce then had a reason to go to war, if he wished, and win Cuba. Pierce Focuses on Spain Meanwhile though, Pierce sent delegates to speak
with Spain, England, and France in Ostend, Belgium to make a deal. The Ostend Manifesto said the U.S. would offer $120 million for Cuba, and if Spain rejected it, the U.S. would be justified in taking Cuba by force. When the Ostend Manifesto details leaked out, Northern free-soilers were up-in-warms. The slavocracy theory seemed more real than ever with these secret dealings. As a result, Pierce backed away from the deal embarrassed. What about Asia? Following the British example, America sought to expand her influence in Asia. Pres. Tyler sent Caleb Cushing to China to work a deal favorable to the U.S. An agreement was reached to start diplomatic
relations and grant "most favored nation" status to the U.S. (opening up trade). The door also opened for thousands of American missionaries to spread the Gospel in China. Focus on Japan Next, the U.S. wanted to link up with Japan. Since Japan was a traditional country that considered westerners to be heathens, they were reluctant to deal with the Americans. The U.S. sent Commodore Matthew Perry to Tokyo in 1852-54. Through a mix of diplomacy and threat, Perry got Japan to
open itself to trade in the Treaty of Kanagawa. This broke Japans centuries-old traditional of isolation, and started them down a road of modernization and then imperialism and militarism. The Gadsden Purchase After gaining California and Oregon, Americans wanted a transcontinental railroad to link the east and west coasts.
Both the North and South clamored to have the line built in their region (for prestige and financial success). The Southern route was eventually chosen as best. There were two reasons the Southern route was considered better: (1) the land was organized meaning any Indian attacks could be repelled by the U.S. Army and (2) geographythe plan was to skirt south of the Rocky Mountains. There was one problem: a portion of the land ran through Mexico. James Gadsden was sent to Mexico to work a deal for the land. The Gadsden Purchase bought the southern chunk of present Arizona and New Mexico for $10 million, a hefty price tag in comparison to other "purchases." Regardless of the price, the transcontinental railroad seemed ready to be built with Southerners happy. Kansas-Nebraska Act
Stephen Douglas threw a wrench in the railroad plans. Being an Illinois senator, he wanted the railroad up north with Chicago as a major terminus. He proposed to organize Kansas and Nebraska through the KansasNebraska Act and move the transcontinental railroad up north. Southerners certainly wouldn't do this, unless they got something substantial in return. The stage was set for a deal to be made The North got the transcontinental railroad moved up North. Also, Kansas and Nebraska were officially organized as territories. The South was awarded popular sovereignty in Kansas and Nebraska. To do this, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was repealed (because it forbade slavery above the 3630 line). Southerners were very happy with the possibility of slavery open to so many lands (the Mexican Cession excepting California, and now Kansas and
Nebraska which had been closed to slavery). Slavocracy theorists said, "There goes the South again, always trying to get more slave land." Despite disagreement, the Kansas-Nebraska Act passed in 1856, repealed the Missouri Compromise, and opened Kansas and Nebraska to popular sovereignty. Congress Legislates a Civil War The Kansas-Nebraska Act may have had the railroad and compromise as its motivation, but it split the nation. It erased the Missouri Compromise and undercut the Compromise of 1850 because it re-opened the slavery issue.
The Fugitive Slave Law was simply left to die by Northerners. This infuriated Southerners. The Democrats were split down the middle over the slavery issue. The Birth of Republicans Another political party, the Republicans, were born. Republicans drew a wide group of people, but they essentially stole the Free Soil position against the expansion of slavery.
Fiona Duignan. Head of Development. ROI. Natalie Creevey. Head of Operations. ROI. Amanda Gray. Head of Operations / Development. ROI. Rosarie Tynan. Head of Operations . ROI. Kevin Carragher. Consultant Regulatory Compliance and Quality Improvement
Example of a One-Chunk Paragraph ROUGH DRAFT (#2) - COLOR-CODED. Student's Name. Mrs. W. Nugent. English I, Period 7. 20 November 2015. The HeartlessStepmother. In "Cinderella," by Charles Perrault, the stepmother is cruel. For example, when the Prince sends his...
Historical Background. Examples. With the advent of the first civilizations in the river valleys of the Nile, Tigris -Euphrates, Indus and Huang He the rise of dense populations required a decision making person or group who would provide protection, help...
Pauli Exclusion principle states that an orbital can hold at most 2 electrons. When 2 electrons occupy the same orbital, they have opposite spins. Hund'srule states that electrons would rather be separate than together in a sublevel with multiple orbitals.
2. More powerful jurisdictional clauses? Choice of forum clause cum electa una via? Good practice, but may not solve all of the problems RTA clauses by which WTO issues are to be solved only in WTO? Not very effective Exclusive...
Includes On-Net, Unlimited local and unlimited LD calling (Customer does not receive Unlimited LD with an IP PBX w/ IP Flex Reach), available on AT&T dedicated transport or bring-your-own-broadband (cable or DSL).
Ready to download the document? Go ahead and hit continue!